US-Iran Talks in Switzerland Suspended After Trump Threats

On Sunday (21st), delegations from the United States and Iran held technical-level talks in Switzerland. According to related reports, tensions unexpectedly emerged on the first day of the talks.


As the U.S. President once again issued threats against Iran, the Iranian side strongly protested, causing the negotiations to be temporarily suspended. The latest developments have once again made the situation between the United States and Iran complicated and unpredictable.



June 22 news: On Sunday (21st), delegations from the United States and Iran held technical-level talks in Switzerland, aiming to reach a final agreement to resolve the Iranian nuclear issue and permanently reopen the Strait of Hormuz. This was the first round of talks after the two countries signed the memorandum of understanding, drawing close attention from global markets.



However, related reports indicate that tensions suddenly arose on the first day of the talks. Due to the U.S. President again issuing threats against Iran, the Iranian side strongly protested, leading to a suspension of the negotiations. The latest developments have once again made the situation between the two countries uncertain.



The latest information shows that the U.S.-Iran negotiations remain suspended.



According to reports from CCTV News and other media, citing Iranian sources on the 22nd, a source said that the talks between Iran and the United States in Switzerland began at around 15:00 local time on the 21st. After lasting about one and a half hours, the talks were suspended for a 30-minute recess as delegations needed internal consultations. However, due to Trump’s threatening remarks, the Iranian delegation refused to return to continue negotiations. Nevertheless, Qatar and Pakistan continued their mediation efforts, with Iran and the United States exchanging messages through intermediaries.



Mediation efforts are still ongoing, but no final result has been achieved. During the talks, the Iranian delegation lodged a clear protest against the U.S. side’s violation of its commitments, especially the violation of Article 1 of the memorandum of understanding.



The Iranian delegation also demanded that the United States accelerate the fulfillment of its commitments, including unfreezing Iran’s frozen assets and issuing sanctions waivers for Iran’s oil exports. On the nuclear issue, the Iranian delegation emphasized that the precondition for opening nuclear-related negotiations is that the United States must fulfill its commitments in accordance with Articles 1, 4, 10, and 11 of the memorandum.



Earlier, Iranian sources reported that a source close to the negotiation team revealed that the Iranian negotiating delegation had left the negotiation site in protest against Trump’s threatening remarks.



In addition, there are reports that during the first round of talks, which lasted about 80 minutes, the United States and Iran did not discuss Iran’s nuclear program. This round of negotiations focused on implementing Article 13 of the memorandum of understanding and prioritizing issues related to Lebanon.



According to the official text of the memorandum of understanding recently released by the United States and Iran, the first article declares an immediate and permanent cessation of military operations on all fronts, including Lebanon; commits both sides to refraining from launching wars or military operations against each other in the future, and to not using force or the threat of force; and ensures the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Lebanon.
The final agreement will confirm the permanent end of the war on all fronts, including Lebanon, as well as other provisions stipulated in this clause.



The United States and Iran Offer Conflicting Accounts



However, regarding the state of negotiations after Trump’s threat against Iran, the two sides again appeared to send inconsistent messages. Informed sources in the United States indicated that negotiations were still ongoing.



According to a senior American diplomat involved in the talks, negotiations continued until early Monday morning local time, covering de-escalation mechanisms to ensure the Strait of Hormuz remains open, as well as how to implement the ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hezbollah in southern Lebanon.



The diplomat added that this meeting was regarded as a starting point for future sustained technical talks.



Trump Threatens Iran Again



On the same day as the U.S.-Iran talks, Trump once again threatened Iran over the Lebanon issue, and also warned that if no agreement was reached, the United States would impose fees in the Strait of Hormuz.



On June 21, local time, U.S. President Trump posted on the social platform “Truth Social” that Iran must immediately stop its “proxy” actions in Lebanon; otherwise, the United States would take stronger military action against Iran and launch another fierce strike, “just like last week, but stronger.”



In an interview the same day, Trump also stated that if the United States and Iran failed to reach an agreement, the United States would become the “guardian” of the Strait of Hormuz and collect 20 percent of the oil revenues in the Middle East.



According to sources in the United States, Trump spoke with Iran by phone on the evening of the 20th, warning them not to close the Strait of Hormuz. Trump told Iranian officials, “If you close it, you will no longer have a country.”



Trump said, “If necessary, we may take over the Strait of Hormuz,” “We will strike them (Iran) fiercely,” and “If they fail to reach an agreement, we will impose tolls.”



Although the United States and Iran had previously signed a preliminary agreement to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, tensions around this vital waterway escalated again over the weekend, just before the two sides held technical-level talks.



On Saturday evening Beijing time, the Iranian military suddenly announced the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, citing the United States’ blatant breach of commitments and Israel’s continued attacks on Lebanon. However, the U.S. side denied this claim (that the Strait of Hormuz had been closed again). U.S. Vice President Vance stated that there was currently no evidence that Iran was closing the Strait of Hormuz. The U.S. Central Command stated that traffic through the strait had increased.



Iran’s statement regarding the Strait of Hormuz cast a shadow over the negotiations, but the direct impact on vessel passage remains unclear.
Iranian side strongly protests


According to Iranian sources, the Iranian delegation lodged a protest with the U.S. side over Trump’s remarks, left the meeting venue, suspended the negotiations that had been underway for 80 minutes, and turned to internal consultations.


Meanwhile, the head of the Iranian delegation and Speaker of the Islamic Consultative Assembly, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, said in a social media post that Iran fundamentally does not take American threats seriously. They had better speak cautiously.


“Have they (the Americans) not thought about it themselves? If their threats were truly effective, they would not be so helpless today. We do not take American threats seriously at all. We advise them to choose their words carefully. Our armed forces are fully prepared and will respond in another manner. No matter how loudly they shout, it will be we who take action.” Ghalibaf wrote.


Regarding this incident, according to Lebanese sources, Iran’s response is clear: unless Trump apologizes for his threatening remarks and Israeli forces withdraw from southern Lebanon, the Iranian delegation will not return to the negotiating table.


It is reported that the negotiation time was extended beyond the original schedule, and whether the Iranian delegation will return to the negotiating table remains unknown.


According to the terms of the memorandum of understanding signed by the United States and Iran last week, the two sides have 60 days for negotiations (extendable by mutual consent) to reach a final agreement. However, Sunday’s incident may only be the beginning of a protracted tug-of-war, with both sides set to argue over issues such as Iran’s nuclear capabilities and the lifting of economic sanctions against Iran.



Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *